Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Stansted Airport Car Parks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

London Stansted Airport Car Parks

Disputed prod. Wikipedia is not a directory or travel guide. — RHaworth (Talk

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete car parks are not really notable and wikipedia is not a travel guide. MilborneOne (talk) 12:15, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not a travel guide. JIP | Talk 15:52, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTADIRECTORY as this being liable to go out of date very quickly. A simplified version of this information might be appropiate on the Stansted Airport article. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 16:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Wikipedia is not a directory, and car parks are not notable. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 17:55, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources, as specified by WP:N. Please note however that AFAIK there are no guidelines or policies saying that car parks are not notable. Paulbrock (talk) 20:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Wikipedia is not Wikitravel. Stifle (talk) 20:33, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The second sentence could be merged into Stansted Airport#Roads, but nothing else is encyclopaedic. Thryduulf (talk) 22:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable for a stand-alone article. Turgan ^Talk 23:50, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.